Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  4 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

The

relationship

between

‘where we

are’ and ‘how

we are’ is

becoming

clearer

Well workplace

Retaining talent

Misery matters

Happiness counts

The case for

investment

There are proven links between

wellbeing, performance and the office:

• Background noise in offices can lead

to performance drops of 66%.

• There is a 10% reduction in

performance if offices are too hot or

too cold.

• Levels of cortisol, a stress indicator,

decrease significantly after 20

minutes in a more natural setting.

• Seeing the colour green for just a

few seconds boosts creativity levels.

• Cognitive functioning doubles when

workers are in well-ventilated offices.

• One third of absenteeism is due to

poor interior air quality.

In fact, bodies of evidence from all

parts of the globe prove that well

designed workplaces are critical for

wellbeing. The message to the real

estate and built environment sector

seems clear: re-humanise spaces to

improve employee performance.

Three quarters of CEOs globally

see accessing and retaining skilled

labour as the biggest threat to their

businesses. Attracting talent is not

easy, and losing it is expensive;

anywhere from 50-200% of a

lost employee’s salary is spent on

recruiting and on-boarding. Some

banks are incurring up to US$1

billion annually in costs associated

with replacing employees. The

‘well’ workplace can be a valuable

attraction and retention tool. A 2013

survey by mental health charity

Mind found that 60% of staff were

more likely to recommend their

organisation as a good place to work

if the employer took action to support

wellbeing. Meanwhile global analysis

shows that companies with satisfied,

engaged workers have 25-65% lower

employee turnover.

Most workers are unhappy. 76% of

the global workforce report they

are struggling with wellbeing, while

research estimates the cost of work-

related stress to be as high as US$650

billion in Europe. Presenteeism –

when workers are present in the

office but functioning at sub-optimal

levels – costs businesses US$1,500

billion each year. Corporations are

understandably striving to identify

links between work environments and

business performance. New data sets

and ways of monitoring activity within

the workplace expose the impact that

the workplace has on staff wellbeing,

retention and ultimately bottom

line performance. The relationship

between ‘where we are’ and ‘how

we are’ is becoming clearer, and as

it does, occupiers are increasingly

willing to invest in real estate to

enhance employee performance.

Our wellbeing as a society is often

measured though gross domestic

product. As real GDP grows, so does

our aggregate standard of living.

However, there are deep flaws and

nuances in this approximation, not

least because it does not address

social or environmental factors.

Consequently, economists and

national leaders are increasingly

measuring the level of a country’s

success using new metrics, including

proxies for happiness. A 2009 study

on alternatives to GDP, commissioned

by then French president Nicolas

Sarkozy, provides challenges to

our basic understanding of the

importance of non-financial factors.

This develops longer standing

thinking, for instance the United

Nations’ Human Development

Index and the Kingdom of Bhutan’s

insistence that it is out to maximize

not GDP but GNH – “Gross National

Happiness.” More than a ‘fad’ this

is becoming a more pervasive shift

in how we categorise a successful

economy – rue the industry that is

not moving to address it.

An abundance of research

demonstrates links between employee

wellbeing and bottom line financial

outcomes. Human happiness has

been found to have large and positive

causal effects on performance.

Positive emotions appear to motivate,

while negative emotions have the

opposite effect. A study by PwC

found cost-benefit ratios ranging

from 2:3 to 1:10 – meaning for every

US$1 spent on promoting employee

happiness, an organisation can expect

to receive US$10 in value back.

Tim Munden, chief learning officer at

Unilever, reinforces this. He estimates

that Unilever recoups an estimated

¤6 for every ¤1 invested in wellbeing

programmes across its European

businesses.

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD

04

COVER STORY